Thursday, August 9, 2007

Assignment 3.9

This is a copy of my resume:

Angel Stanley
3431 Amber Bay Loop
Anchorage, AK 99515
907-317-0804-Cell Phone
907-677-0765-Home Phone

thestanleys@gci.net

Objective
Administrative Coordinator for a medical office

Related Qualifications

  • Create and monitor processes and procedures
  • Analyze financial spreadsheets
  • Budget management
  • Coordinate Doctor's schedules
  • Employee counseling
  • Authorize medication refill requests appropriately
  • Administrative support
  • Accurate billing practices
  • Word and Excel proficiency
  • Keyboarding 70 words per minute

Education

  • Associates of Applied Science Medical Offices Administration, 2007 Charter College, Anchorage, Alaska
  • Certification in Medical Billing and Coding, 2006 Charter College, Anchorage, Alaska
  • Microsoft Office Specialist, Word, 2007
  • Currently persuing a Bachelors of Science in Information Technology Managment, Charter College, Anchorage, Alaska

Experience

Providence Behavioral Medicine Group, Anchorage, Alaska

September 2003-Current

I am currently listed as on-call status. My last worked day was 04-13-2007

  • Administrative Coordinator: Develop and monitor processes and procedures, create efficient filing systems, manage doctors schedules to ensure financial targets are met, monitor and provide guidance for support staff, created and managed quality improvement program, meet reporting deadlines, employee counseling
  • Administrative Assistant: Direct support to Practice Manager and clinical nurse, numerous clerical duties
  • Support Staff: assist patients will all related needs.

Carlile Transportation,Anchorage Alaska

March 2003-September 2003

  • Billing Clerk: Worked independently to bill invoices accurately

Trans America Glass, Anchorage, Alaska

September 1996-March 2003

  • Office Supervisor: Directed staff of five, administrative support, price quotes and wholesale estimates. This included invoicing, inventory ordering and receiving, creation of dailyand monthly sales reports, coordinated domestice and international freight shipments, designed layouts for glass fabrication, troubleshooting, operating high volume phone system, and customer service

Thursday, August 2, 2007

Extra Credit Assignment 7.3

I chose cluster 3 of chapter 10 to write about.

Who decides what a woman can do with her body with regards to reproductivity? As with the case of China, you get one child and that's it. Well, now you can pay to have another one. Who says the government had the right to make that decision? Was there a vote on it and ALL women agreed to it?

In America we have the inherent right to decide if, when and how many children we can have. I think this is very important. However, I do think that women who have children just to collect or extend their welfare benefits should not be allowed to continue to have children. I think that a person should have as many children as they can reasonably support.

Parents have more money and guilt, now that both parents work outside of the home, to direct towards their children. Here we can create the perfect child. I can go to the infertility clinic and chose the profile of the sperm and/or egg donor I like the best, go through the procedures and hopefully have the child of my engineering. I think parents feel guilty that they don't spend much time with their children so they buy them off with activities, beautiful clothes and electronics...etc. This is supposed to make up for good old fashioned being with family. In fact, I believe the text book states that we have turned our children into little adults.

In the past children weren't given rights to much in the household. They were told what to do, when to do it, and how to do it. There were expectations that they were going to contribute to the family household financially or with labor. If they didn't they got beat. Today children feel entitled to make demands and don't feel like they have to contribute to the family.

Today we can create the perfect child. We can literally physically create the child of our dreams,. We can mold them however we want, we give them rights that perhaps they don't deserve, nor do they know what to do with. We have higher expectations now, we direct our children to do "great" things that we didn't do, or to become just like us if we are successful and happy with our lives.

It is not acceptable for the government to have rights over a woman's body, to tell her what she can do with it and when. Nor is it responsible of the government to give her money to take care of all of these children she insists on having.

Fathers have become much more involved in the rearing of children than they had been in the past. In fact, many fathers are the primary care giver for the children. I encourage that. Men can contribute somethings to the children's lives that a mother can't. The book says "fathers, in effect, give children practice in regulating their own emotions and recognizing others' emotional cues." For girls they show how to have a great relationship with their spouse. They show their girls that they should want to be valued as a woman, wife. "Dads give teenage girls confidence that they can expect men to be interested in them for reasons beyond sex.

In conclusion, it is a woman's right to have as many children as she wants. It is a man's right to create as many children as he wants. We have the ability to create the perfect child for us, but is that morally right? It is proven that children with both parents in their life grow up to be a more competent member of society with realistic expectations.

Assignment 7.2

I chose to do my assignment on cluster 2, Great Expectations. Are we looking for the "perfect" relationship and why? Historically people married for necessity. For example, status, money, convenience...etc. The thought of love didn't matter. I can remember reading some books where the father arranged a marriage and the daughter, often much younger than the groom-to-be, would say, "but Daddy, I don't love him" and her father dismissing her as silly or stupid. I can remember him telling her that the union would join the two lands together so that they could farm a larger area. And she would hang her head and eventually the marriage would go through.

In those types of relationships, I suspect there was a lot of abuse and infidelity. It seemed alright for the man to have affairs, but not the woman. In fact, it was often public knowledge that farmer john visited the brothels or kept a girlfriend in town if he was wealthy. However, it was not acceptable for the wife. She was to be a virgin and was supposed to maintain the appearance of the proper wife. Today if there is infidelity it's because one person feels they are not getting something at home that they need. It doesn't necessarily mean sex, but maybe conversations or whatever, just a level of intimacy or communication that is missing from home.

Now it seems that both men and women have come to realize that marriages do not have to be arranged for economic or status reasons. They are free to join a relationship and make the proper efforts. Women are more independent and self sufficient than in the past. Perhaps the 1950's wife was afraid to leave because she had no way to support herself or her children, and no where to go because divorce was looked upon as very bad. Today, If it doesn't work, there are plenty of options for leaving the relationship.

The text talks about same-sex marriages and the controversy that is constantly going on. It seems unfair to make it legal one year, and then turn around another year and say nope, not legal. I personally don't care what your "family" looks like. I think that perhaps the commitment level of same-sex marriages are stronger than a lot of traditional marriages. I think that the same-sex partners have spent a lot of time overcoming adversity to get to the point of marriage that they have given it plenty of thought and energy. They also realize what the effects can be if they need to separate, as far as any children or common items such as house, car...etc. Again, the commitment level is stronger. It would be nice for someone to make a real final decision on this subject so the country can move on.

Assignment 6.1B

Chapter 6 talks about doing the research for your paper. It gives details on how to read the researched material properly to pull out useful data. It tells you how to take notes, annotate, summarize etc. Of course it talks about plagiarism. The chapter goes on to give ideas for material sources and gives descriptions of the different types of sources.

Chapter 7 talks about how to document correctly. How to use foot and end notes. How to properly organize a bibliography.

As I have most of the research done I will use Chapter 7 the most for my paper. It is important to properly give credit where credit is due and cite the sources properly. This is an area of weakness for me. Meaning, I always give credit, it's just difficult for me to get it in proper format.

Assignment 6.3

This assignment is a review of Chapter 9 on Body Image. I have chosen cluster 2, Why Are So Many Americans Overweight? This is a topic that I have written about several times here in my time with Charter. It is a shame that this generation of children are so overweight. The text book states "it would be the fist time in 200 years that children would be statistically likely to live shorter lives than their grandparents." This should be alarming to all of America. I see article after article that say children of America are fat, they are overweight, they are the fatest kids in history....but in my opinion, I don't see the level of urgency to create and IMPLEMENT a solution that is on a crisis level of the articles.

In a world where we are so busy going here and there, filling our days with as much activities as we can and where both parents work outside the home, we have taken the food out of the home and put it in the car. In a time when mom stayed home with the kids and made dinner so that it was ready when Dad got home from work at 6pm, she was able to provide and monitor proper food intake. She was able to send the kids outside to play, essentially because there wasn't much to do inside the house. So by nature she was ensuring they ate the proper nutrients and that they got the proper level of exercise to prevent the majority of obesity. I am sure there were plenty of overweight people at that time, however, they were the exception, not the norm.

The text book makes a point that dieting and bariatric surgeries have soared in recent years. I think these are quick fixes to a long term problem. If adults would take a look around and see their children are getting fat, they would start to change their own ways and lead their children to a healthier lifestyle through example. Eating healthier foods, eating at home as a family, exercise individually and with the family, and simply turning off the electronics can go a long way towards reversing the current trend towards obesity.

Assignment 5.2

I chose to write read about cluster 1 of chapter 8: "who owns words and ideas?" This is a very interesting topic. The question is, "Is it really possible for anyone to 'own' words or ideas?" If so, how much does that person own? Do they own the actual result of the word or idea, do they own the written words, as in the case of the poem Footprints in the Sand, do they own the very idea of the result. Again, three women claimed to have written Footprints in the Sand, who really owns the poem? Was it the person who, let's say, wrote it on a napkin at a luncheon one day, or is it the person who actually went to the proper authorities and had it copy written? I think for all legal purposes it should be claimed by whomever actually went through the copy write process. This will give the court system something to stand on when the lawsuits start to come in. Instead of having to make an emotional decision, or one person trying to prove they had the idea first, the courts can simply look at the copy write and see who the owner is.

What is the difference between collaboration and cheating. As the book indicates Georgia Tech had a very strict policy on collaboration. It stated that there was to be absolutely no collaboration, discussion...etc with other students. The policy was clearly stating that the students may not discuss the class with each other at all. That seems like such a hard thing to do. By nature humans collaborate on a daily basis. It can be something as simple as asking the spouse what they want for dinner. Or it can be as controversial as the Georgia Tech issue. In school work, I believe that students should be able to collaborate to help figure out the processes'. Collaboration has been proven to improve school grades, come up with more creative results. collaboration has been part of most every new invention we have in the world. If someone hadn't said, "hmmmm..I'd like to see the TV in color. I wonder how we can do that?" And then went to the TV companies and said, "this is my idea, how can we make it happen?" We'd all still be watching black and white television. To there credit Georgia Tech reviewed and revised the policy very quickly to allow collaboration in the assignments, but just not in the tests, where the students are truly scored for their learning abilities.

It is the responsibility of all people to give credit where credit is due. It is the responsibility of the person who thought up the idea to protect it if they feel it could be of use in the future.

Assignment 7.1

I sent Dr. Kaufman my rough draft via email a couple of weeks ago. I think I'll have my mom edit my paper as she is one of my fathers editors. Then I will review her edits, make appropriate changes, place in proper MLA format, and create a bibliography page. There isn't much else to write for this assignment.